No subject
Sat Nov 12 19:29:10 PST 2005
database point of view, the "relation" should be extracted into a =
separate=20
table. I planned to use a container-managed entity bean for that =
"relation"=20
table, and have both of the "objects" in the relationship keep a =
reference to=20
the "relation" entity bean. Both of the object entity bean will update =
relation=20
entity bean. Is this OK? Is there any better solution? </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thank you very much for your time and =
for your=20
help. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Xiaoying</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
--Boundary_(ID_7mc6wjg/tXgeJ8CgHWNVWw)--
---
To unsubscribe, mail advanced-java-unsubscribe at xcf.berkeley.edu
To get help, mail advanced-java-help at xcf.berkeley.edu
More information about the Advanced-java
mailing list