[Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

[gg at catking.net]

On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 21:24:10 +0100, Mukund <muks at mukund.org> wrote:

> gg at catking.net wrote:
>> Ahh, I did not see what your previous comment meant. Caught out by this
>> damn ML reply-to setting again.
>>
>> I'm subscribed to several lists which operate in a more logical way: I
>> get a msg from the list , I hit "reply" in my email client and it
>> replies to the list.
>>
>> Since the msg came from the ml not from your address the reply-to header
>> is counter intuitive.
>
> It actually isn't. You may want to read this:
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Mukund
>
>

It isn't what? Counter intuitive, it is. I get an email for the list not  
 from the individual, when I hit reply it replies to the individual I need  
to reply to the sender, ie the list.

There may be arguements for and an against but pls let's not start  
swamping gimp-devel with that.

I was simply offering my appologies for the confusion and explaining why.

gg.