[Gimp-developer] What would be a better set of default resources?

GSR - FR famrom at infernal-iceberg.com
Wed Jul 22 14:54:27 PDT 2009


Hi,
shirakawa.akira at gmail.com (2009-07-22 at 1218.30 +0200):
> Martin Nordholts wrote:
> 
> > I get your drift, but is it really reasonable to force a user to scale a 
> > say 250px brush to 3px if that is what he desires? It might be, but I 
> > don't think it is with our current scaling mechanism. What do you think 
> 
> Regarding this, as an user (and not a programmer), I've always wondered 
> why in the case of vector brushes a "scaling" setting is used instead of 
> fiddling directly (and easily) with their size.

I avoid scale whenever I can, so for vector brushes I just use the
brush editor. And I would wish any other brush would be "editable". In
other words, support "pixmap" as "shape" for the editor, or some other
solution instead of the current mix of methods.

GSR
 


More information about the Gimp-developer mailing list