[Gimp-docs] Migration path to xml2po
Axel Wernicke
axel.wernicke at gmx.de
Fri Sep 22 08:04:27 PDT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
as I see it this is a topic which is not solved within a couple of
posts. Before changing our technology we should consider the pros and
cons very carefully. I agree that editing the xml docbook files is
not that easy, but right now I don't see how the usage of the po
technology solves that problem. To me it seems that we would just add
another non trivial technology on top of the docbook xml files?!
May be we should have a closer look to other projects doing multi
language documentation in a distributed environment. The GNOME
documentation team seems to be well organised - are they doing their
work in different languages?
Greetings, lexA
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFFE/uCR9mXLVsAbiQRAtGyAJkBVSbxnZpHaSQrs66oBr2Kyn0QjQCgtoO3
JZYdDGoSZjmdhE7uUMHb/4g=
=0akp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Gimp-docs
mailing list