[Gimp-docs] Migration path to xml2po

Axel Wernicke axel.wernicke at gmx.de
Fri Sep 22 08:04:27 PDT 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi all,

as I see it this is a topic which is not solved within a couple of  
posts. Before changing our technology we should consider the pros and  
cons very carefully. I agree that editing the xml docbook files is  
not that easy, but right now I don't see how the usage of the po  
technology solves that problem. To me it seems that we would just add  
another non trivial technology on top of the docbook xml files?!

May be we should have a closer look to other projects doing multi  
language documentation in a distributed environment. The GNOME  
documentation team seems to be well organised - are they doing their  
work in different languages?

Greetings, lexA
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFFE/uCR9mXLVsAbiQRAtGyAJkBVSbxnZpHaSQrs66oBr2Kyn0QjQCgtoO3
JZYdDGoSZjmdhE7uUMHb/4g=
=0akp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Gimp-docs mailing list