[Gimp-docs] make install failure

[Roman Joost]

On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:56:28PM +0200, Ulf-D. Ehlert wrote:
> Roman Joost (Donnerstag, 11. Oktober 2007, 13:44):
> > Usually no. It would be much better if you could attach your patch to
> > the bug. In the meantime I talked to Sven who suggested to handle the
> > image files recursivly.
> 
> If we don't want this nice output when copying, we can consider 
> something like
>
> [...] solutions
Yeah - I thought about this as well. Sven proposed (correct me if I'm
wrong) that every (or most) image directory contains a Makefile which
keeps care of "building", copying, installing etc. So the installation
will scale better with the amount of images ...

> > Ulf, lets do it that way: I'll attach my patch to the bug, which
> > fixes the dist target. Could you check if you could fix the install
> > procedure with a find, xargs command?
> 
> I've attached my patch to bug #481338 (did you mean that?).
Great - I'll try it :)

> BTW, if possible we should replace ':=' with '=' when defining the 
> IMAGE_* macros, so that they are only expanded when needed.
Sounds good to me. Create a bug with a bug attached which fixes it, or
better (if it's just a minor thing) fix the macros yourself :)

-- 
Roman Joost
www: http://www.romanofski.de
email: romanofski at gimp.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : /lists/gimp-docs/attachments/20071012/1715e133/attachment.bin