[Gimp-docs] Gimp-docs Digest, Vol 61, Issue 12

[sular at juno.com]

Stop sending me this
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

-----Original Message-----
From: gimp-docs-request at lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU

Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:00:10 
To: <gimp-docs at lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU>
Subject: Gimp-docs Digest, Vol 61, Issue 12


Send Gimp-docs mailing list submissions to
	gimp-docs at lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gimp-docs-request at lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gimp-docs-owner at lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gimp-docs digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Where have all my pictures gone? SOLVED (Ulf-D. Ehlert)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:00:22 +0200
From: "Ulf-D. Ehlert" <ude88 at web.de>
Subject: Re: [Gimp-docs] Where have all my pictures gone? SOLVED
To: gimp-docs at lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Message-ID: <200906201900.30166.ude88 at web.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"

Kolbj?rn Stuest?l (Freitag, 19. Juni 2009, 17:34):
> SOLVED

No, we still have to adapt the Makefile(s) to Cygin/Windows.

> Your (Ulf) suggestions works with "hardlink" and "copy"!

Did it also work with "html/LL/images" being a link 
to "../../xml/LL/images", or only when you linked/copied the files 
directly to the html directory?
(I can add a simple test for Cygwin using an autoconf macro and then 
modify the relevant Makefile commands accordingly, but I have to know 
which parts of the Makefile to change.)

> This resulted in html files pointing to LANG (here "nn") images
> when they exist, otherwise to C images. Just as supposed. I have
> not figured out which one of the methods is the be recommended,
> hardlink or copy. To me they seems to be equal.

Using hardlinks seems to be better, since this way we won't create new 
files and copy several MByes of data, instead just directory entries 
are added or updated (at least, under Linux).
Don't know if hardlinks are portable, though (but it looks like 
hardlinks are even more portable than symlinks),

Bye,
Ulf
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : /lists/gimp-docs/attachments/20090620/2185c5f7/attachment-0001.bin 

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Gimp-docs mailing list
Gimp-docs at lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs


End of Gimp-docs Digest, Vol 61, Issue 12
*****************************************