[Gimp-docs] Is bugzilla up-to-date?

[Roman Joost]

Hi Andrew,

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 01:07:51AM -0400, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
> I went to bugzilla, brought up a report, opened the corresponding XML 
> file, and the bug was fixed. I assume the bug was fixed because there 
> was a note in the header that stated that the file was changed to 
> accommodate that particular bug. On the other hand, the bug was still 
> listed as "not verified" and it had no comments.
> 
> I only checked one bug, and at that point I stopped. I did not pursue 
> this to check dates (bad me).
Which bug btw?

> Is it worth my time to check bugzilla for documentation issues (since I 
> am working through the documentation)?
Sure it is. You should assign the bug to yourself if you are work on
one. I had one clash with Ulf in the past, where he was faster with
fixing and pushing his changes than me :)


> I should mention that I am impressed with how good the existing 
> documentation is.
Cheers!
-- 
Roman Joost
www: http://www.romanofski.de
email: romanofski at gimp.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : /lists/gimp-docs/attachments/20090630/700a4d7b/attachment.bin