[Gimp-user] scaling
David Gowers
00ai99 at gmail.com
Tue Sep 25 00:31:04 PDT 2007
On 9/25/07, Andrew <ald2 at arrakis.es> wrote:
> The Wikipedia article certainly was over my head.
>
> From what I read on the Gimp bug page lanczos scaling is not yet
> perfect. (But then what is?)
>
> I have to upscale images from 16M to 48M and it seems the client takes
> them apart and looks at them through a microscope and rejects them if
> there are signs of sharpening or interpolation artefacts.
>
> So far as I can see, my Gimp (2.4.0-rc2) does have lanczos downscaling
I know. That is why I made a point of saying it doesn't. It has some
strange facsimile of Lanczos downscaling. If you compare ImageMagick's
implementation with GIMP's, you can see a clear difference (and that
ImageMagick gives better looking results.)
For your requirements, if you don't need to do much interactive
processing, I recommend ImageMagick. For a start, it has many
different interpolation filters (specified using '-filter FILTER'
commandline parameter) that you can try for image scaling, compared to
GIMP's three. I'm certain that one of them will obtain better results
for your particular situation.
More information about the Gimp-user
mailing list