[Gimp-web] GIMP Brainstorm

[Chenaux David]

No sorry I haven't read the INSTALL file, I'll do it now.
About the community, mhh you're probably right... perhaps we don't have to
make a new community... but I still believe that gimp needs a direct link
between users and developers.

About the wiki, I don't really understand what it is for (not the one of the
UI team, the other). Is it something like the actual documentation ? It
seems very outdated, what's the aim to keep it online ?

2009/1/11 Martin Nordholts <enselic at gmail.com>

> Sven Neumann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 18:48 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> >
> >
> >> It would be nice if you could take the best bits from these two wikis:
> >>
> >> http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/GIMP_UI_Redesign
> >> http://wiki.gimp.org/gimp/
> >>
> >> and put the useful stuff on gimp.org.
> >>
> >
> > Sorry, but I have to disagree. gui.gimp.org is the workplace of the UI
> > team and it does not need to be integrated with the main web-site. And
> > the wiki is in most parts even more outdated and confusing than what
> > www.gimp.org has to offer. What we really need is to check all the
> > information on www.gimp.org for correctness. Update outdated tutorials
> > and documentation, remove what's obsolete and add what's missing.
> >
> >
> > Sven
> >
> >
>
> I should clarify; I didn't mean that he should put everything on the
> wikis on the webpage, only that he should look through the wikis and see
> if he could find some useful info on the wikis that would be worth
> putting on gimp.org. Chances are there isn't any info worth
> moving/mirroring on gimp.org but I'm pretty sure there is *something*.
>
> I completely agree with you though that it is probably better to first
> make sure that the current info on gimp.org is up to date before putting
> new stuff there.
>
> - Martin
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /lists/gimp-web/attachments/20090111/0dd0b873/attachment.html